This post is a part of our weekly group discussion. It discusses the controversy behind Amin Taha's 15 Clerkenwell Close which has been ordered for demolition multiple times because of the use of stone on its exterior.
This building won RIBA National Award and was also almost nominated for the annual Carbuncle Cup - a competition finding the worst buildings in the UK.
I personally really like this building as it incorporates the natural use of stone in three ways from its exterior to the interior. By keeping the original characteristics of the limestone, Taha stays true to the materials while tying the building very closely to the historical value of the site.
The use of stone on the exterior defies the usual straight edges and neat lines that we are so used to. I think the use of stone, rough in some areas and smooth in others showcases the qualities of limestone which would be lost if it were all smoothed out. I think the fact that it does not appeal to everyone is what caused the entire saga.
The first demolition order sent out was due to an error by the planning council. This was shortly followed by another demolition order which I believe is due to personal preference. The fact that the use of stone is not consistent on the exterior seemed to bother a particular council member to the point that he sent a demolition order. In order to keep the building from being demolished, Taha was told to roughen the stone on the entire facade to even out the appearance. Overall, I think the entire demolition saga was completely unfair as it was based only on opinions without even considering the meaning behind the appearance.
The use of true materiality is continued into the building as seen in the photos below. Personally, I really the aesthetic and to see this building being demolished would be a shame.
Comentários